Diabetic Malingering: Part One

Happy Halloween!

In corrections, we see an awful lot of malingering, symptom magnification, and outright medical deception.  This comes in many forms, from alleging vomiting when none has occurred, to falsely claiming to be hearing “voices,” to deliberately abrading the skin and then complaining that medical can’t get rid of “my rash.”  From never-ending back pain with vague leg numbness to pseudo-seizures.  But of all of the many kinds of behaviors of this sort, the one that is perhaps the hardest of all to deal with and carries the greatest risk of adverse outcomes is diabetic malingering.

Before we delve into diabetic malingering, however, we should define some terms, because often the terms for these types of behaviors are misused.

Faking, Symptom Magnification and Malingering

The first terms to contrast are “faking” and “symptom magnification.”  In order to accuse a patient of faking, you have to be sure that they have no symptoms at all.  A good example of this is pseudo-seizures.    Pseudo-seizures may be deliberate fake seizures; but not all of them are.  For example, a person who is hyperventilating will have spasms of their hands that they may refer to as a “seizure.”  They are having some symptoms—the hand tremors—and are magnifying their significance by calling them seizures.  But they are not faking.  Some patients do fake injuries, like the patient who deliberately abrades her skin to cause a rash.  However, most malingering that I see occurs in the context of symptom magnification rather than outright faking.

“Malingering” means that the patient is feigning or exaggerating an illness or injury for some sort of personal gain.   Originally, malingering referred to beggars in medieval Europe who concocted sham skin ulcers to gain sympathy and cash.  In the military, “malingering” referred to faking illness to avoid combat or work details.  But the central concept is that the patient is engaging in some sort of deceptive behavior with a goal in mind.  To say that a person is truly malingering, you have to be able to say exactly what it is that the patient hopes to accomplish by pulling off this deception.  Outside of corrections, for example, a person may want workman’s compensation so magnifies the severity of a work injury.  Another may want to obtain Social Security Disability and so claims that their Bipolar Disorder is so severe that they cannot work.

We tend to see different goals in corrections. A common one is the patient who hopes to score some Seroquel or some other sedating drug and so claims to be hearing voices or to have severe anxiety.  Another example is the patient who exaggerates the extent of ankle sprain to avoid a dorm work assignment.  Finally, my jails house a lot of overflow prison inmates, who are seldom happy to be in a county jail.  They exaggerate and fake illnesses in hopes of being transferred back to the prison.  The principle in all of these cases is the same—in order to say a patient is “malingering,” you have to identify the goal.

“Symptom magnification” also means that the patient is exaggerating the extent of an illness or injury, but without the connotation of doing it to obtain something.  For example, some people have histrionic personalities and always exaggerate the extent of their illnesses as a matter of habit.  They always have the worst headache, the worst cough, their pain (even a hangnail) is always 10 out of 10 on the pain scale, etc.  Unless they have a specific goal in mind (other than simply attention seeking), I don’t consider this to be true malingering.

So if I say a patient is symptom magnifying, the implication is that the patient is attention seeking but has no other particular goal in mind.  If I say that a patient is malingering, I mean that the patient does have a particular goal and I need to be prepared to say what that goal is.

Diabetic Malingering

The typical goal of diabetic malingering in corrections is to get out of jail.  There are a lot of other inmates like this; who say, basically, “I’m too sick to be housed in a jail.  You can’t take care of me here.”  I have heard this complaint from inmates with heart disease, cancer, COPD, well, all sorts of medical problems.  Of course, we can take care of most of them.  We even once had a quadriplegic patient at the Ada County Jail in Boise for several weeks (“What crime could a quadriplegic patient be charged with,” you ask, “that would land him in jail for several weeks?”  Answer:  Intimidating a Witness).  If our excellent nursing staff can take care of that guy, they can take care of almost anybody.

However, diabetic malingerers are a special breed, because, unlike most other types of malingering, diabetics can actively make themselves sick.   They do this by creating an insulin-carbohydrate mismatch.  In Type 1 diabetes the balance between insulin and available sugar is precarious and easily disrupted.  In the best of patients, the blood sugar numbers jump around.  Malingering type 1’s can manipulate their blood sugars in many ways.  They do things to cause severe hypoglycemic reactions.  Alternatively, they make sure that their blood sugars remain dangerously high, despite our efforts to control them.  And remember, their overall goal is to prove that the medical staff is incompetent to care for them and hopefully to get out of jail and maybe even file a successful lawsuit.

In this, they are like the inmate who abrades his skin to create a rash that medical then cannot get rid of.    Diabetic malingerers are not faking or exaggerating subjective symptoms such as nausea or back pain; they are actively trying to harm themselves.  They can make themselves so sick that they need to be emergently transported to the hospital.  They can even end up killing themselves, intentionally or not.

I know of one patient (not at one of my jails, thank goodness) who caused himself to have multiple severe hypoglycemic reactions in order to avoid going to prison.  He orchestrated so many hypoglycemic events at the jail where he was housed, that he succeeded in being released from jail on recognizance.  But then he continued to cause himself to have hypoglycemic events hoping to delay his sentencing and inevitable prison sentence.  It was a strategy that worked for him for a couple of years.  Unfortunately, he ended up with renal failure as a consequence of this self-abuse and died in his early 30s.

I believe that this could have been avoided.  Correctional medical personnel should be taught to recognize the various forms of diabetic malingering and what steps to take in countering them.  If you can figure out what the patient is doing to mess up their diabetic control, you can usually intercede and stop the self-harm.  This is what we will discuss in the next post.

Summary

  1. “Malingering” means faking or exaggerating an illness to achieve some sort of goal.  “Symptom magnification” also means exaggerating an illness or injury, but in the context of seeking attention.  “Faking” means that the patient has no symptoms or illness and is making the whole thing up.  It is a term that is overused.
  2. Most malingerers exaggerate subjective symptoms like pain or nausea.  This is a nuisance, but they are unlikely to harm themselves.  Diabetic malingerers, on the other hand, actively seek to harm themselves by manipulating their blood sugars.  They can do this in several ways and potentially can suffer harm and even death as a result of their actions.
  3. Correctional personnel should be aware of the various ways in which malingering diabetics can harm themselves and the steps to take to counter these efforts

Coming Wednesday this week:  Diabetic Malingering, Part Two.  Scams and Solutions!

Has diabetic malingering been a problem in your facility?  Please comment!

5 thoughts on “Diabetic Malingering: Part One

  1. James Ondricek

    We have treated a lot of diabetics with varying degrees of success in the Davis County Jail. Thankfully we do have a lot of very experienced RN’s on staff 24 hours a day to treat them before they require emergency hospital care. But as you say it is not the one time emergency treatment that is so hard to deal with, it is the chronically uncontrolled diabetic who may be deliberately trying to harm themselves or simply don’t care and eat whatever they feel like without regard to the consequences. I have found that even though we order special diets for diabetics and notify the commissary so that they are not allowed to purchase concentrated sweets on commissary, they will find a way to get candy if they want it. They simply trade with other inmates, taking food off their trays or trade their hygiene items or coffee or whatever else for sweets if they want it. We currently have a diabetic inmate in this second category. He asks the staff for too much insulin because he knows he will be eating sweets later, then his blood sugars spike or drops unexpectedly and we are constantly be called back to check on him later. He is not trying to get out of jail or kill himself; he simply does not care about his health or the consequences of his misguided actions. In cases such as his, we move him out of general population and house him in medical infirmary for a week or two and monitor his blood sugars where we can guarantee he has no access to commissary or any food other than the diabetic diet that the jail provides him. He is not allowed dayroom time with other inmates while he is in medical and he temporarily controls his blood sugars in this protected environment. After missing TV, football games, and talking to his friends in general population for a while it is amazing at how much more receptive he becomes about diabetic teaching. Seldom have we had to repeat this process on the same inmate twice but we would if we had to, to protect his health from himself.

    Reply
  2. Al Cichon

    Diabetes is a disease of ‘control’ (compliance) and when diabetics are incarcerated (we take away their freedom) their blood sugar is the only thing they can now control – manipulate. They may have used their disease to manipulate their social environment in the past as well. One fellow would open his uniform and turn away – shielding the nurses / himself from exposure (actually squirting the insulin on the floor, etc.) then complained about his glucose readings. We have stopped accepting responsibility for the glucometer readings – we provide the right diet / medication and the glucometer results are the responsibility of the inmate (by controlling intake/ exercise).

    Reply
  3. Pingback: Reader Question: Diabetic Malingering Part 3 |

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *